Warning: Parameter 2 to qtranxf_excludeUntranslatedPosts() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/acfbgqjy/public_html/dev.acf.bg/wp-includes/class-wp-hook.php on line 286

Warning: Parameter 2 to qtranxf_postsFilter() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/acfbgqjy/public_html/dev.acf.bg/wp-includes/class-wp-hook.php on line 286

Warning: Parameter 2 to qtranxf_excludeUntranslatedPosts() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/acfbgqjy/public_html/dev.acf.bg/wp-includes/class-wp-hook.php on line 286

Warning: Parameter 2 to qtranxf_postsFilter() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/acfbgqjy/public_html/dev.acf.bg/wp-includes/class-wp-hook.php on line 286

Warning: Parameter 2 to qtranxf_excludeUntranslatedPosts() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/acfbgqjy/public_html/dev.acf.bg/wp-includes/class-wp-hook.php on line 286

Warning: Parameter 2 to qtranxf_postsFilter() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/acfbgqjy/public_html/dev.acf.bg/wp-includes/class-wp-hook.php on line 286

Warning: Parameter 2 to qtranxf_excludeUntranslatedPosts() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/acfbgqjy/public_html/dev.acf.bg/wp-includes/class-wp-hook.php on line 286

Warning: Parameter 2 to qtranxf_postsFilter() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/acfbgqjy/public_html/dev.acf.bg/wp-includes/class-wp-hook.php on line 286

Election fraud: prevalence and impact in Bulgaria. Parliamentary Election, July 2021

You can download the analysis from here. In the end of March 2021, the Anti-corruption Fund published a list of polling stations that were at a relatively high risk of vote purchasing or manipulation. These polling stations were identified with reference to the results of the parliamentary elections in 2013, 2014, and 2017, and on the basis of the following three models: The multicomponent abnormal behavior model helps identify polling stations which are outliers in terms of at least two out of three indicators, i.e., they stand out either with unusually high voter turnout in comparison with the voter turnout within the relevant municipality and/ or unusually high number of votes for the winner-party in comparison to the number of votes it received within the entire municipality, and/or with abnormally high numbers of invalid ballots or votes. The second model helps identify deviations in the voter turnout in a specific polling station between two consecutive elections. The third model helps record volatility in the political preferences of voters within a specific polling station between two consecutive elections — this can be a significant increase or drop in the votes given for a particular political party in that polling station. On the basis of the results of the parliamentary election held in April 2021, the Anti-corruption Fund published an updated list of polling stations at a higher risk of vote purchasing or manipulation. ACF also provided an analysis of the dimensions of the votes at risk at national, regional, and municipal level. The methodology was updated by introducing a new variation with a higher outlier value threshold for deviations in voter turnout and for the results of particular parties. ACF identified between 1,491 (high outlier threshold) and 2,101 (low outlier threshold) polling stations at risk, which received between 9% and 13% of the total votes in the country. The instant analysis consists of two parts. The first part focuses on the voting tendencies in polling stations that were considered at a higher risk of vote purchasing and manipulation during the April 2021 election. The second part presents the results of applying the methodology for identification of votes at risk of purchasing and manipulation to the data from the parliamentary election held in July 2021.   parlamentarni_july_EN_WEB

Сподели:

Warning: Parameter 2 to qtranxf_excludeUntranslatedPosts() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/acfbgqjy/public_html/dev.acf.bg/wp-includes/class-wp-hook.php on line 286

Warning: Parameter 2 to qtranxf_postsFilter() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/acfbgqjy/public_html/dev.acf.bg/wp-includes/class-wp-hook.php on line 286

Analyses

Analysis: THE WRONGFUL INVOCATION OF THE INVESTIGATIVE SECRET EXEMPTION IN ADMINISTRATIVE BODIES’ REFUSALS TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO PUBLIC INFORMATION

Was there a fictitious payment bearing Karimanski’s signature: What the forensic report reveal

ACF: We have reported violations involving BGN 294 million to the PFIA — in most cases the Agency does not react or classifies the information

Parliamentary elections, November 2021: What happened at the polling stations at risk?

Some interesting facts revealed by the preferential votes

Yavor Zlatanov’s interview for ACF confirmed the “Eight Dwarfs” story

Election fraud: prevalence and impact in Bulgaria. Parliamentary Election, July 2021

Election fraud: prevalence and impact in Bulgaria. Part II - Presidential election 2016. European Parliament Election, 2019

ACF’s Annual Monitoring Report for 2020

An ACF analysis shows which political parties received the most paid and controlled votes in the last Bulgarian parliamentary election in April

Broken Legitimacy: prevalence and impact of controlled and purchased voting in Bulgaria

THE ILLUSION OF THE BULGARIAN LEGISLATOR – creating a mechanism for effective investigation of the Prosecutor General

EXERCISING CONTROL OVER THE PROSECUTION FUNCTION – THE NECESSARY CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM

"The Eight Dwarfs" - The facts, a legal analysis, conclusions, and an appeal to the institutions

Ten questions about “The Eight Dwarfs” that remain unanswered

Annual monitoring report on investigations of high-level corruption "Anti-corruption institutions: activity without visible results."

MOTOR VEHICLE SEIZURE IN TRAFFIC CRIMES WILL LEAD TO CONSIDERABLE PROBLEMS

IDENTIFIED PROBLEMS WITH PROSECUTION PROCEEDINGS DURING ТHE STATE OF EMERGENCY

PUBLIC RESPONSIBILITIES, PRIVATE GAINS: How a governmental agency created a profitable private enterprise

FEAST IN TIMES OF PLAGUE: How the Bulgarian Food Safety Agency gave away millions for animal carcass disposal

Crony Capitalism and political influence threaten energy security in Bulgaria: How two Bulgarian politicians became key players in the energy sector

Apartmentgate: the property deals of senior public officials

From Pazardzhik To Prague: Ginka Varbakova and the multilevel clientelism and corruption in the energy sector

Anticorruption Institutions: Trends and Practice

10 YEARS OF EU MEMBERSHIP: WEAK INSTITUTIONS AND POLITICAL CORRUPTION STILL PERSIST